> They would certainly not be cheap, because they are relatively more
expensive due to the extra depreciation cost.
This depends on how long you expect to keep money on a side chain and how
many transactions you plan on doing. Inflation is a great way of paying
PoS / PoB miners - that cannot in
>Miners who are able to deal with the bandwidth caused by drivechain coffee
transactions will profit from these transactions, whereas smaller and more
geographically distributed miners will not. Those miners will, in turn,
build faster ASICs and buy more electricity and drive out smaller players.
On 6/23/2017 10:19 AM, Erik Aronesty wrote:
> > They would certainly not be cheap, because they are relatively more
> > expensive due to the
> extra depreciation cost.
>
> If you design the inflation schedule correctly, it should be balance
> transaction costs *precisely*.
You have not explained
