>OP_RETURN
I think it is redundant here to have the , we can implicitly
assume what the sidechain_id is since we have a fixed set of drivechains.
I.e. mining reward is index 0, mimblewimble sidechain is index 1, etc.
CryptAxe has specific indexes defined already in his implementation:
https://gi
In Drivechain, 51% of miners have total control and ownership over all of the
sidechain coins. The vision of Drivechain is to have many blockchains "plugged
in" to the main chain.
Today, well over 51% of miners are under the jurisdiction of a single
government.
Thus the effect of Drivechain ap
> >OP_RETURN
>
> I think it is redundant here to have the , we can
> implicitly assume what the sidechain_id is since we have a fixed set
> of drivechains. I.e. mining reward is index 0, mimblewimble sidechain
> is index 1, etc. CryptAxe has specific indexes defined already in his
> implementatio
