Hi, I didn't want to comment on
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-February/013643.html
because it seemed to me that thread was more broad.
I like bip8 very much as an extension to bip9, but I think it could be better.
With bip9, a bip9-ready node that sees a softfork act
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:32 PM, CryptAxe via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Also the block number can only change by +1 or -1, so when a new h* is
> added to the
> queue it must be compared to the most recent h* in the queue.
> std::abs(queue.back().nHeight - ToAdd.
Hello Bitcoin-Dev,
CVE-2017-9230 (1) (2), or commonly known as ‘ASICBOOST’ is a severe (3) (4) and
actively exploited (5) security vulnerability.
To learn more about this vulnerability please read Jeremy Rubin’s detailed
report:
http://www.mit.edu/~jlrubin//public/pdfs/Asicboost.pdf
Andreas
