Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal to update BIP-32

2016-04-21 Thread Marek Palatinus via bitcoin-dev
Sipa, you are probably the most competent to answer this. Could you please tell us your opinion? For me, this is straightforward, backward compatible fix and I like it a lot. Not sure about the process of changing "Final" BIP though. Slush On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Jochen Hoenicke via bitc

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal to update BIP-32

2016-04-21 Thread Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev
In practice the probability of this case triggering is on the order of 2^-128 or something astronomically tiny. I've been using BIP32 for a few years already as have many others...I don't think we've ever had to handle this case. Justifiably, many app developers feel like the additional complexi

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal to update BIP-32

2016-04-21 Thread Pavol Rusnak via bitcoin-dev
On 21/04/16 17:28, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I don't think we've ever had to handle this case. This is the main problem: we are not sure, because not a lot of software does this checks. Also even if you do check, it's hard to handle an exception (you can't always skip - what if the p