Hi Yanmaani,
> Unfortunately, this isn't really possible. If they did that, you could get
> consensus splits. This is why all the other stuff is so important - if
> Bitcoin is subverted via soft-fork, you *can't* just run your own fork.
I am aware of this problem however looking for solutions o
Good morning yanmaani,
> > 3.More people from different countries getting involved in important
> > roles.
>
> Isn't Bitcoin already plenty distributed? Funding people in
> under-represented countries seems to me like a textbook exercise in
> 'box-ticking, but moreover, I'd frankly rather have re
On 2021-11-05 08:17, Prayank via bitcoin-dev wrote:
What followed it (whitepaper being shared on different websites) was
true decentralization and we need something similar in other aspects
of full node implementations. Few things that can improve
decentralization:
1.More people using alternativ
Good Afternoon,
Talk about the present and the future is misguided if it concludes that
the decentralisation of a project itself is responsible even if the
operation of the project is to produce a specification, and a software
capable of performing transactions in a decentralised manner. There
Hi Kate,
> He is taking the most sensible way forward, decreasing bus factor.
Agree. Work being shared with other maintainers is an improvement.
> Read: https://laanwj.github.io/2021/01/21/decentralize.html
Interesting blog post. First paragraph talks about strange expectations, not
sure what
Hi Owen,
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 9:25 PM Owen Gunden via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 04:47:17PM +0200, Prayank wrote:
> > > It seems confusing to have two sites that seemingly both represent
> > > bitcoin core.
> >
> > There is only one we
Hello, Owen,
The GPG signature verification has changed for bitcoin core version 22
and later. There were two main changes:
1) The sha256 checksums are now in a separate file from the GPG
signatures. So download a new file named "SHA256SUMS" (contains the
checksums) and also the "SHA256SUMS.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 07:37:48PM +, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 20th, 2021 at 3:20 PM, Owen Gunden via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > I also notice that, as of 22.0, Wladimir is no longer signing the
> > releases, and I have no trust in my gpg network of the people who seem
> > t
On Wednesday, October 20th, 2021 at 3:20 PM, Owen Gunden via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> I also notice that, as of 22.0, Wladimir is no longer signing the
> releases, and I have no trust in my gpg network of the people who seem
> to have replaced him.
This is not correct. Here are Wladimir's attestati
On 10/20/2021 03:20 PM, Owen Gunden via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I also notice that, as of 22.0, Wladimir is no longer signing the
> releases, and I have no trust in my gpg network of the people who seem
> to have replaced him.
It is signed with his personal key, as well as the personal keys of
several
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 04:47:17PM +0200, Prayank wrote:
> > It seems confusing to have two sites that seemingly both represent
> > bitcoin core.
>
> There is only one website which represents Bitcoin Core full node
> implementation. You can download Bitcoin Core from
> https://bitcoincore.org
I a
Hi Owen,
> When I search for "download bitcoin core" my top result is bitcoin.org, which
>is out of date and doesn't have 22.0
This is an issue related to SEO which only website owners can fix or maybe
others can help who know better.
> It seems confusing to have two sites that seemingly both
12 matches
Mail list logo
