> more than sufficient support for LOT=True to proceed safely
This seems to contradict what you said about "there was never any consensus
reached on the LOT parameter". Can you clarify?
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 4:13 AM BitcoinMechanic via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
I concur that reviewing #21377 is the best path at this time.
However, I want to draw attention to the middle road here:
If Core chooses to not release activation params (which has been discussed
as a general concept previously), #21377 can also be used to safely issue a
community release.
It's
Hi Bitcoin Mechanic
I will attend but I will be looking at Core PR #21377 over the next
couple of days and I would encourage other reviewers to review that PR
too. If that PR is merged into Core I would strongly recommend any
alternative release be fully compatible with the activation parameters
i
Taproot activation meeting on IRC - Tuesday 13th April 19:00 UTC
The focus of the meeting will be ratifying the Taproot activation plan
previously discussed at the March 16th meeting (aka 2021-03 Plan Y as
summarized here):
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1K3pmH09yXLTHGV3wqFZGR3ei7QVwtdE
