> Anyway, according to the current considerations I explained in this email,
> I’d suggest extending BIP-155 with per-link-direction negotiation, but I’m
> interested in the opinion of the community.
I don't have a strong opinion here but intuitively, it seems to me that
per-link variant makes
Hi,
### Introduction
I was recently looking into AddrMan and I realized that unlike with blocks
(BIP152) and transactions (a node can opt-out via various mechanisms such as
blocks-only or block-only-relay), address relay is under-specified.
For example, we had a discussion [1] on whether SPV n
