Hi Pieter,
Thanks for the detailed response.
> /secret key/secret keyI'll try to summarize the discussion we had that led
> to this choice, but most of it is on
> https://github.com/sipa/bips/issues/195 if you want the details.
Ahh I can't believe I missed that github issue while searching. I
On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 6:00 AM, Lloyd Fournier via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I felt this topic deserved it's own thread but it follows on from the mailing
> list post [2] announcing a new PR [1] to change BIP-340 in several ways,
> including adding random auxiliary data into the no
Hi List,
I felt this topic deserved it's own thread but it follows on from the
mailing list post [2] announcing a new PR [1] to change BIP-340 in several
ways, including adding random auxiliary data into the nonce
derivation function. Rather than hashing the randomness with the secret key
and mess
