This post by Gavin got rejected by the moderators.
Without a doubt this moderation policy is already a disaster. I'm fully
expecting this message to get rejected too, but so you can see it Rusty: so
far in the reject bin there are messages from:
- Well known uber-troll Gavin Andresen
- And
On Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:59:11 AM Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> - All rejected posts will be forwarded to a list for public viewing:
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev-moderation/
They are not readable, they all say:
> An embedded message was scrubbed...
signa
>
> - Posts must concern the near-term development of the bitcoin core
> code or bitcoin protocol.
>
Are block size discussions considered acceptable, then?
___
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxf
Hi all,
We aim to make the list more contentful and productive; to get devs to
resubscribe we need to maximize high-value interactions.
- Currently 5 moderators. BtcDrak, me, G1lius, Kanzure and Johnathan.
As far as I know we're entirely unconnected, and we cover Asia/Europe/US.
- Moder
