On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 2:12 PM, Russell O'Connor
wrote:
>
> and there are probably other designs for signature aggregation beyond the
> two designs I'm discussing here.
>
For example, in private communication Pieter suggested putting the
aggregate signature data into the top of the first segwit
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Matt Corallo
wrote:
> Gah, please no. I see no material reason why cross-input signature
> aggregation shouldn't have the signatures in the first n-1 inputs replaced
> with something like a single-byte push where a signature is required to
> indicate aggregation,
