On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:49 PM Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> I feel like this breaks the central idea of PSBT that a PSBT contains
> everything you need to construct a transaction.
> This would rely on parties in the transaction having state and remembering
> things which I don't think i
Hi Andrew,
I think having some of these extensions would be great.
On 3/6/19 1:08 PM, Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> 1. Add an field to PSBT_GLOBAL_UNSIGNED_TX to the global table which contains
>just a txid of the unsigned transaction, for bandwidth savings in case
>signers ha
Hi all,
I'd like to start initial discussion about an extension to BIP174 [1] to add
some fields that I've found myself wanting when using PSBT in practice. For
now I'll just list the things that I'd like to see, and if we can come up
with a stable list then I'll try to write up a more formal dra
