Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 113: Median time-past is a HARDfork, not a softfork!

2015-11-01 Thread Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
On Monday, November 02, 2015 4:27:50 AM jl2...@xbt.hk wrote: > Currently, a tx maybe included in a block only if its locktime (x) is > smaller than the timestamp of a block (y) > > BIP113 says that a tx maybe included in a block only if x is smaller > than the median-time-past (z) > > It is alrea

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 113: Median time-past is a HARDfork, not a softfork!

2015-11-01 Thread jl2012 via bitcoin-dev
Currently, a tx maybe included in a block only if its locktime (x) is smaller than the timestamp of a block (y) BIP113 says that a tx maybe included in a block only if x is smaller than the median-time-past (z) It is already a consensus rule that y > z. Therefore, if x < z, x < y The new rul

[bitcoin-dev] BIP 113: Median time-past is a HARDfork, not a softfork!

2015-11-01 Thread Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
BIP 113 makes things valid which currently are not (any transaction with a locktime between the median time past, and the block nTime). Therefore it is a hardfork. Yet the current BIP describes and deploys it as a softfork. Furthermore, Bitcoin Core one week ago merged #6566 adding BIP 113 logic