Hello,
It makes no sense to me to not switch to 32-byte keys. There are
literally no (or very mild) disadvantages to this, from what it
appears like. I don't think refraining from updating a proposal just
because it's been out there for awhile is a valid reason, personally.
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 a
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 11:17 AM Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> if we're going to change things, it's perhaps best to do it as cleanly as
> possible and also drop that byte.
>
I personally lean toward just dropping the byte. I like the simplicity an
Hello all,
It has been suggested [1] to drop the Y oddness bit in the witness
program for Taproot outputs. This seems like a worthwhile change, as:
* The bit doesn't actually contribute to security.
* It avoids Taproot outputs from being more expensive to create than v0 P2WSH.
* It doesn't preclud
