Hi Luca,
Bravissimo!
Please allow me to encourage your to follow the BIP workflow as specified
here
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0002.mediawiki#BIP_workflow
BIP Editor freely allocates BIP numberss, however that does not constitute
approval but allows for much easier discussio
Hi Luke,
thanks for your feedback.
I can try to coordinate with the OpenAssets group, but the base
requirements are completely different. For example, they are very far
from any form of plausible deniability.
Please tell me which problems are not solved technically, so that I can
try to fix
I think you could check out and coordinate with the OpenAssets proposal.
Your current draft also claims to solve a lot of problems that it doesn't
actually solve technically...
Luke
On Wednesday 06 September 2017 11:44:47 Luca Venturini via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like t
Hi Dan,
thank you for your feedback. Let me clarify that the plausible
deniability is a property of the protocol. If this will become a BIP,
and will be approved, there will be wallets that will manage tokens. In
the meantime, and in the future, it is important that a person with a
legacy bit
Hi everyone,
I would like to propose a standard protocol to manage tokens on top of
the Bitcoin blockchain.
The full text is enclosed and can be found here:
https://github.com/token21/token-protocol-specification
Any feedback will be appreciated.
Luca Venturini
---
Abstract
This
