Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bech32m BIP: new checksum, and usage for segwit address

2021-01-17 Thread nakagat via bitcoin-dev
Dear. Peter, I'm not good at English, so I'm sorry for the poor explanation. I thought that BECH32M_CONST could be created from hrp and data instead of constants. I thought that the error position would be the same as bech32 by recalculating the value created from hrp and data. If this were pos

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bech32m BIP: new checksum, and usage for segwit address

2021-01-15 Thread nakagat via bitcoin-dev
Dear Pieter, I read the BIP draft of Bech32m and implemented it in Go. Let me ask you one question. Does Checksum have to be fixed? The 'bech32_verify_checksum' function has hrp and data as parameters, so how about committing Checksum with these two values? For example, calculate Checksum from h

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Multisignature for bip-schnorr

2018-09-12 Thread nakagat via bitcoin-dev
ted key for which the > attacker can sign alone (without requiring Alice's partial signature). The > Schnorr BIP links to the MuSig paper which describes a secure key aggregation > scheme. See https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/068 > > On 8/7/18 6:35 AM, nakagat via bitcoin

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Multisignature for bip-schnorr

2018-08-31 Thread nakagat via bitcoin-dev
Hi all, I wrote t-of-k threshold signature procedure using bip-schnorr. If you have time to review and give feedback, I’d really appreciate it. Thanks in advance! Threshold Signatures https://gist.github.com/tnakagawa/e6cec9a89f698997dc58a09db541e1eb Original https://github.com/sipa/bips/blob/b

[bitcoin-dev] Multisignature for bip-schnorr

2018-08-13 Thread nakagat via bitcoin-dev
Hi all, I wrote a multisignature procedure using bip-schnorr. If you have time to review and give feedback, I’d really appreciate it. Thanks in advance! Multisignature https://gist.github.com/tnakagawa/0c3bc74a9a44bd26af9b9248dfbe598b Original https://github.com/sipa/bips/blob/bip-schnorr/bip-s