If the bugfix can be backported to earlier versions why is the
hype/hysteria about "everybody" must immediately upgrade to 0.16.3
currently being spread on the forums/reddit?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5034070.0
https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/9hp90p/1775_nodes_out_of_9616_1
You launched the political football by coming here with a verbose
'recommendation'. Without a code submission in form of pull request to
the core repo on github this was never a technical discussion.
On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 19:53 -0400, Scott Roberts via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Whatever their failings
It's controversial not contriversial.
And it isn't controversial except among a small clique, which you seem
to be the sole representative of here. It might be time to consider
unsubscribing (again) if you don't seem to know when to shut up and the
moderators are letting you go on an inappropriate
On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 15:15 -0500, Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> My preference is height activation + one step per block (i.e. also
> height). Height seems KISS.
>
>
Under this scheme the size of the step-per-block increase could be
decreased every 210,000 blocks (at time of reward halvin
The general concept has merit and the basic outline here seems sound
enough. I have harboured a notion for having "archived UTXO" for some
time, this is essentially it. The retrieval from archive cost is on the
UTXO holder not the entire storage network, which is then only bearing
full 'instant' re
Although the planning for this a bit far along now, one consideration I
might add from experience on working with other transglobal IT projects
is the effect of timezones on local mood/alertness/awareness etc. The
guys at 9am pinging on their first coffee in the antipodes will be in a
different mi
Validated - (seen on network)
Settled/Cleared - 1 conf
Finalised - 6 confs
On Sat, 2015-07-25 at 00:37 +1000, Vincent Truong via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
> "Fast transactions"
> Fast transactions implies it is slower than Visa, and Visa is
> 'instant' by comparison from the spender's POV. Bitcoin
Why RSA?
>
> Here is an idea, inspired by TOR, on which I would like to have some
> feedback: We create an anonymous routing layer between Electrum servers
> and clients.
>
> * Each server S publishes a RSA public key, KS
> * Each client receives a list of available servers and their pubkeys
> *
