Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary

2022-08-19 Thread aliashraf.btc At protonmail via bitcoin-dev
Hi Peter, everyone This issue has been discussed thoroughly in bitcointalk, general discussions are more suited to forums, I believe, still First and foremost, it is more than obvious that bitcoin block subsidy algorithm is a total disaster, not just for the zero subsidy security consequen

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee

2022-08-01 Thread aliashraf.btc At protonmail via bitcoin-dev
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 05:24:35PM +, alicexbt via bitcoin-dev wrote: > like a hashcash-based alternative broadcast scheme. Hi Peter, I've been mulling the idea of attaching work to low fee txns, both as a compensation (e.g., in a sidechain, or an alt), and/or as a spam proof. Unfortunately

Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants

2022-07-24 Thread aliashraf.btc At protonmail via bitcoin-dev
I suppose it is more about spending from vaults, rather than locking in. A covenant would impose rules for spending tx.e.g. :Don't spend this output unless it is claimed by a tx which 1) Spends it as a whole in the very first output. 2) This output is P2SH with specified script pattern ( a TLC sc

Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants

2022-07-24 Thread aliashraf.btc At protonmail via bitcoin-dev
--- Original Message --- On Saturday, July 23rd, 2022 at 9:11 PM, Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I'm thinking such a covenant effort would be more a technical process aiming > to advance the state of covenant & contracting knowledge, collect and > document the u