On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 11:10:02AM -0500, Ethan Heilman via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> >SHA1 is insecure because the SHA1 algorithm is insecure, not because
>> 160bits isn't enough.
>>
>> I would argue that 160-bits isn't enough for
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Gavin Andresen via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>> Matt Corallo writes:
>> > Indeed, anything which uses P2SH is obviously vulnerable if there is
>> > an attack on RIPEMD160 which reduces it's security only marginall
On Jan 7, 2016 5:22 PM, "Gavin Andresen via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Pieter Wuille
wrote:
>>
>> Bitcoin does have parts that rely on economic arguments for security or
privacy, but can we please stick to using cryptography tha
