Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP-352 Silent Payments addresses should have an expiration time

2023-08-06 Thread Samson Mow via bitcoin-dev
Why the 180 year limit? imho should plan for longer. On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 10:41 AM Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > tl;dr: Wallets don't last forever. They are often compromised or lost. When > this happens, the addresses generated from those wallets

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Yesterday's Taproot activation meeting on lockinontimeout (LOT)

2021-02-18 Thread Samson Mow via bitcoin-dev
"An activation mechanism is a consensus change like any other change, can be contentious like any other change, and we must resolve it like any other change. Otherwise we risk arriving at the darkest timeline." Who's we here? Release both and let the network decide. On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 3:0

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Segwit2Mb - combined soft/hard fork - Request For Comments

2017-03-31 Thread Samson Mow via bitcoin-dev
A compromise for the sake of compromise doesn't merit technical discussions. There are no benefits to be gained from a 2MB hard-fork at this time and it would impose an unnecessary cost to the ecosystem for testing and implementation. On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Sergio Demian Lerner via bitco

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Increase block size limit to 2 megabytes

2016-02-08 Thread Samson Mow via bitcoin-dev
Gavin, please don't quote that list on the Classic website. It's horribly inaccurate and misleading to the general public. > That testing is happening by the exchange, library, wallet, etc providers > themselves. There is a list on the Classic home page: > > https://bitcoinclassic.com/ I know for