On Wednesday, November 8, 2023, <
bitcoin-dev-requ...@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> delvingbitcoin.org is something I setup; it's a self-hosted discourse
> instance.
nice.
> For what it's worth, I think (discourse) forums have significant
> advantages over email for technical discussion:
>
that will
consume alarmingly high resources and cost a fortune in hosting
every month.
l.
>
>
> On Tuesday, November 7th, 2023 at 3:20 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, November 7, 2023, <
bitcoin-dev-requ...@li
On Tuesday, November 7, 2023,
wrote:
> Rooms can be E2E encrypted.
please, NO.
there are people who have such valuable skills that their
lives are put in danger if they engage in encrypted conversations.
additionally the entire point of an open project IS THAT IT IS OPEN.
mailing lists are th
(apologies i am subscribed digest)
On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 1:00 PM
wrote:
> Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2022 04:18:04 +
> From: alicexbt
> To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
>
> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin covenants are inevitable
> Message-ID:
>
>
> Hi Jorge,
>
>
> Misinformati
with many thanks to NLnet, the EUR 50,000 grant to research and
develop Draft cryptographic primitives and instructions to the
newly-open Power ISA has been approved.
unlike RISC-V where full transparency and trust is problematic and
there are many participants whose interests may not necessarily
would it help by first setting a regular period of e.g. 6 months when
only at that time would consensus rules ever be changed? not, "6
months from now taproot will be introduced', a rule, "*any* consensus
change regardless of what they are (including NO change) will *ONLY*
be made at regular inter
(cc'ing over to libre-soc-dev)
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-February/018392.html
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 8:21 AM ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> > i was stunned to learn that in a 28nm ASIC, 50% of it is repeater-buffers!
>
> Well, that surprises me as well.
> [...]
> So I supp
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 3:01 PM Bryan Bishop wrote:
> I don't see what you're talking about? None of your February emails
> were sent to ozlabs according to the archives there. Threads for the
> bitcoin-dev mailing list are stored here:
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/20
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 6:10 AM ZmnSCPxj wrote:
>
> Good morning Luke,
morning - can i ask you a favour because moderated (off-topic)
messages are being forwarded
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev-moderation/
could you send these instead to libre-soc-...@lists.libre-soc.org?
many t
On Wednesday, February 3, 2021, ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> Good morning again Luke,
:)
> If you mean miner power usage, then power efficiency will not reduce
energy consumption.
> Thus, any rational miner will just pack more miners in the same number of
watts rather than reduce their watt consumption.
(hi folks do cc me, i am subscribed digest, thank you for doing that,
ZmnSCPxj)
On Wednesday, February 3, 2021, ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> Good morning Luke,
>
> I happen to have experience designing digital ASICs, mostly pipelined
data processing.
> However my experience is limited to larger geometries a
folks, hi, please do cc me as i am subscribed "digest", apologies for the
inconvenience.
i've been speaking on and off with kanzure, asking his advice about a libre
/ transparently-developed ASIC / SoC, for some time, since meeting a very
interesting person at the Barcelona RISC-V Workshop in 2018
12 matches
Mail list logo
