Dear Eric,
thank you for sharing your thoughts.
It obviously boils down to political beliefs, not so much technical
arguments. I understand that you are in favor of a "guided
decentralization" and you are most happily invited to follow this path. I
don't want to be on it. I want total decentralis
Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev
schrieb am Mo., 17. Aug. 2015 um 16:03 Uhr:
> NxtChg,
>
> In the entire history of Bitcoin we’ve never attempted anything even
> closely resembling a hard fork like what’s being proposed here.
>
> Many of us have wanted to push our own hard-forking changes to the
> p
Interesting. I am writing down something similar. Will share soon.
Upal Chakraborty via bitcoin-dev
schrieb am Mo., 17. Aug. 2015 um 11:45 Uhr:
> I have tried to solve the maximum block size debate, depending on the
> previous block size calculation.
>
> Requesting for comment - http://upalc.com
Hey everyone,
as with the current "max block size" debate I was wondering: Is anyone here
in favor of a minimum block size (say 2 MB or so)? If so I would be
interested in an exchange (maybe off-list) of ideas. I am in favor of a
lower limit and am giving it quite a bit of thought at the moment.
Hear hear Tamas,
I agree. I personally prefer to use the "only-bigblocks" branch and not XT
with all its features - but as I am not mining that doesn't mean much
anyhow. Nevertheless I am happy to be able to publicly proclaim my opinion
that the block size should be raised asap.
Thank you for goi
