On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 11:08:58PM +, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 09:37:22AM -0600, Bryan Bishop via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Anti spam has been an issue for the moderators. It's relentless. Without
> > access to the underlying server, it has been difficult to figh
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 09:21:39AM +0100, Prayank wrote:
> >??the last thing we need is
> a rushed upgrade
>
> Why do you think this is rushed? Speedy Trial will have few months and if
> UASF is required it won't involve activation immediately after ST fails.
> Taproot by 2022 doesn't look rushe
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 05:20:04PM +, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> At the previous meeting, there was consensus for BIP8 activation parameters
> except for LOT, assuming a release around this time. Since then, a release
> has not occurred, and the new idea of Speedy Trial has been pro
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 06:21:59PM +, Chris Belcher via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> It is wrong to say that using miner signalling alone for activation
> (LOT=false) is a bug.
That depends on the definition you choose to work with but since the community
had to produce a fix that implies something wa
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 01:06:14AM +1000, Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 07:33:30PM +, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > As we saw in 2017 with BIP 9, coordinating activation by miner signal
> > alone,
> > despite its potential benefits, also leaves open t
