Re: [bitcoin-dev] Announcing Libforesta

2023-08-01 Thread Bastiaan van den Berg via bitcoin-dev
Am i correct in the following interpretations? - the utreexo bridge peers are the only real bitcoin nodes - you cant use -only- libfloresta to be a node , you cant mine with it, you cant do normal tx with it - you are targetting webbrowsers ( , i'm really confused about the why of this) On Mo

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: Wallet Lock, Unlock BIP idea

2016-01-14 Thread Bastiaan van den Berg via bitcoin-dev
You might not be aware, but the wallet supports encrypting. Which then means that when Mr Badguy steals your wallet.dat, he cannot do anything with it without the passphrase. See RPC calls 'encryptwallet' 'walletpassphrase' and 'walletlock'. Also i'd like to say, that adding a big waving flag in t

Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T/ISPs making Bitcoin Core near impossible to use as a full node via hidden private dynamic IPs, not by specifically blocking 8333 or Bitcoin as stated in original email

2015-09-04 Thread Bastiaan van den Berg via bitcoin-dev
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Zach G via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > It's not so simple though, AT&T will not let you have a public static IP > without paying. Not sure, but, what part of bitcoin development are you addressing in this email? -- buZz

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Significant losses by double-spending unconfirmed transactions

2015-07-15 Thread Bastiaan van den Berg via bitcoin-dev
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Me via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > Blockcypher's "confidence factor" model(1) > > under the hood - yet another one of those sybil attacking network > > monitoring things > > > Peter, I noticed on your twitter you have a lot of b