** Motivation **
As everyone already knows, over the last seven months or so, the size of the
mempool as well as transaction fees of on the bitcoin network have both been
abnormally high. This tend has generally been ascribed to the introduction of
ordinals, and while this may be both technical
While I don't necessarily disagree about the block size limit, efforts to
increase it in the past has been effectively stonewalled since, as it turns
out, all you have to do to not increase it is nothing.
If we are looking to address the current mempool spam in particular, it looks
to me that i
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, October 18th, 2022 at 9:00 AM, Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> I mean, if you think the feedback is wrong, that's different: maybe we
> shouldn't care that zeroconf apps are in immediate danger, and maybe
> bitcoin would be better if any that d
Not sure if I'm missing something, but I'm curious if (how) this will work if
the sponsored transaction's feerate is so low that it has been largely evicted
from mempools due to fee pressure, and is too low to be widely accepted when
re-broadcast? It seems to me that the following requirement
>
