On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 10:11 AM Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
>
> I'm really unsure that three months is a short enough time window that there
> wouldn't be a material effort to split the
> network with divergent consensus rules. Instead, a three month window is
> certainly long enough to
I found a hint of common ground in reddit that I absolutely loves and
just had to share here on the ML to discuss
Luke's suggestion: To minimise the signal from 90% to 50%+1 during the
MUST_SIGNAL phase.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/lwvg78/making_the_case_for_flag_day_activation_of_t
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 12:25 PM Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
>
> At this point in time it also appears the greatest risk to Taproot
> dying a slow death is a small group of developers who think talking in
> conservative tones and talking about endless philosophy makes Bitcoin
> a conserv
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 12:09 PM Keagan McClelland via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
>
> If social consensus is what drives technical consensus and not the other way
> around it seems as if there cannot exist a valid (rational?) reason to oppose
> Taproot itself, and then by extension with the arguments la
Hi Michael
I think you're right, sorry for getting a little apocalyptic at the
end there lol.
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 3:08 AM Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
>
> Thanks for your response Ariel. It would be useful if you responded to
> specific points I have made in the mailing list post or at
