Re: [bitcoin-dev] PSBT global key for network

2019-10-03 Thread via bitcoin-dev
Hi Jimmy, The only time I could see this being a problem is in the case of a fork-coin. Otherwise the likelihood that two unrelated networks could have a tx with an id that is identical are low. Everything included in PSBT thus far is info for verifying something helpful, and providing the inform

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 39: Add language identifier strings for wordlists

2018-01-07 Thread via bitcoin-dev
This is very sad. The number one problem in Japan with BIP39 seeds is with English words. I have seen a 60 year old Japanese man writing down his phrase (because he kept on failing recovery), and watched him write down "aneter" for "amateur"... So instead I had him use Copay which generates Japan

Re: [bitcoin-dev] A BIP for partially-signed/not-signed raw transaction serialization; would it be useful?

2017-01-10 Thread via bitcoin-dev
supply an xpub for multisigs to the > server, get txs, and do signing offline or in the browser) > > Maybe have a look over it and see if it starts to capture some of the > things you would want! > > All the best, > Thomas > > > > On 9 January 2017 10:36:49 CET, "木

[bitcoin-dev] A BIP for partially-signed/not-signed raw transaction serialization; would it be useful?

2017-01-09 Thread via bitcoin-dev
I have been seeing issues like the following many times on all the different projects that support multisig with users responsible for partial transaction transport. https://github.com/OutCast3k/coinbin/issues/73 I would like to gather opinions before proposing a BIP, (like whether we need one or