Re: [bitcoin-dev] Examining ScriptPubkeys in Bitcoin Script

2023-10-27 Thread Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev
Anthony Towns writes: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 02:10:37PM +1030, Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev wrote: >> I've done an exploration of what would be required (given >> OP_TX/OP_TXHASH or equivalent way of pushing a scriptPubkey on the >> stack) to usefully validate Taproot outputs in Bitcoi

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinals BIP PR

2023-10-27 Thread alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
Hi Peter, > At that point, why are we bothering with numbers at all? If BIP #'s aren't memorable, what is their purpose? Why not just let people publish ideas on their own web pages and figure out what we're going to call those ideas on a case-by-case basis. I agree people can maintain BIPs in th

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP for OP_CAT

2023-10-27 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 01:08:03AM -0400, Ethan Heilman via bitcoin-dev wrote: > We've posted a draft BIP to propose enabling OP_CAT as Tapscript opcode. > https://github.com/EthanHeilman/op_cat_draft/blob/main/cat.mediawiki If you're interested in making this available via inquisition, here's a s

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinals BIP PR

2023-10-27 Thread Alexander F. Moser via bitcoin-dev
A mostly self-managed scheme without exploding number spaces and half-decent quality control: New ideas and proposals-in-development are in a draft/discussion state without any assigned or reserved BIP ordinal and remain as such until the following three conditions are true: 1 - author(s) cons

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Examining ScriptPubkeys in Bitcoin Script

2023-10-27 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 02:10:37PM +1030, Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I've done an exploration of what would be required (given > OP_TX/OP_TXHASH or equivalent way of pushing a scriptPubkey on the > stack) to usefully validate Taproot outputs in Bitcoin Script. Such > functional