After more than a year of tinkering, iterating, simplifying, and
implementing, I'm excited to officially publish (and request BIP numbers
for) the Taproot Assets Protocol. Since the initial publishing we've
retained the same spec/document structure, with the addition of a new BIP
that describes the
> that does not change the fact that Alice -> Bob -> Zack was mined in the
> blockchain, and those transactions exist
If you use it in that way, then cut-through is pointless. The whole point of
using it is scaling. If you have only "Alice -> Zack" transaction, that is
included in some block,
