Hey
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 8:04 PM Manuel Costa via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> "Long time listener, first time caller". Just sharing my 2 sats:
>
> While I find it stimulating, I think this discussion (and other similar
> doom-like scenarios) is somewhat irrele
Hi Bitcoin Developers,
Bitcoin knots has a config option to disallow address reuse in mempool:
spkreuse=conflict or GUI -> Settings -> Options -> Mempool. I tried
experimenting with it and running 2 nodes(signet) for which anyone can check
'getrawmempool' at a given time using:
GET /mempool?no
"Long time listener, first time caller". Just sharing my 2 sats:
While I find it stimulating, I think this discussion (and other similar
doom-like scenarios) is somewhat irrelevant in practice.
When the time comes and if we start seeing issues with block rewards being
too low to maintain acceptab
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 09:16:55PM -0400, Undiscussed Horrific Abuse, One
Victim of Many via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I worry that this form of "rfc timestamping" misleads its users into
> believing the timestamps of their documents are preserved. These kinds
> of user interaction issues can be very d
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 04:54:11AM +, alicexbt via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > If they'reparties interested in implementing more RBF policy options in
> > Bitcoin Core, I think they're free to propose suchchanges and invest the
> > engineering effort to do so. If you're interested in advancing the
On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 07:16:49PM +, alicexbt wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> > Only because the block reward goes away. If it was made to continue
> > indefinitely - most likely with an inflation hard fork - demand for block
> > space
> > would not be critical to Bitcoin's security.
>
>
> I am not
