Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taro: A Taproot Asset Representation Overlay

2022-04-11 Thread Bram Cohen via bitcoin-dev
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 11:21 AM Olaoluwa Osuntokun wrote: > Hi Bram, > > > The witnesses for transactions need to be put into Bitcoin transactions > > even though the Bitcoin layer doesn't understand them > > Is this related to Ruben's comment about invalid state transitions > (published in the

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taro: A Taproot Asset Representation Overlay

2022-04-11 Thread Olaoluwa Osuntokun via bitcoin-dev
Hi Ruben, > Also, the people that are responsible for the current shape of RGB aren't > the people who originated the idea, so it would not be fair to the > originators either (Peter Todd, Alekos Filini, Giacomo Zucco). Sure I have no problems acknowledging them in the current BIP draft. Both the

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Simple step one for quantum

2022-04-11 Thread Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
FWICT: Streamlined NTRU Prime (sntrup) has no known patent issues. Should be fine. Regardless, a "double-wrapped bitcoin address of some kind" can be specified, coded up and the relevant module replaced whenever the dust settles. I know Bitcoin doesn't (yet) have fee "weights", but i still think

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taro: A Taproot Asset Representation Overlay

2022-04-11 Thread Olaoluwa Osuntokun via bitcoin-dev
Hi Bram, > The witnesses for transactions need to be put into Bitcoin transactions > even though the Bitcoin layer doesn't understand them Is this related to Ruben's comment about invalid state transitions (published in the base chain) leading to burned assets? In the past, I've considered using

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Simple step one for quantum

2022-04-11 Thread Olaoluwa Osuntokun via bitcoin-dev
The NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography competition [1] results should be published "soon": https://groups.google.com/a/list.nist.gov/g/pqc-forum/c/fvnhyQ25jUg/m/-pYN2nshBgAJ . The last reply on that thread promised results by the end of March, but since that has come and gone, I think it's safe to exp

Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Pre-BIP] Fee Accounts

2022-04-11 Thread Jeremy Rubin via bitcoin-dev
> nonsense marketing I'm sure the people who are confused about "blockchain schemes as \"world computers\" and other nonsense marketing" are avid and regular readers of the bitcoin devs mailing list so I offer my sincerest apologies to all members of the intersection of those sets who were confuse

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Speedy Trial

2022-04-11 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 11:58:48AM +0200, Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 6:21 AM Anthony Towns wrote: > > > Let's discuss those too. Feel free to point out how bip8 fails at some > > > hypothetical cases speedy trial doesn't. > > Any case where a flawed proposal makes