> If that's really true then you're wasting my and everyone's time here.
It isn't waste of time but important for everyone to understand different
opinions about soft fork activations before moving to next soft fork.
The reason I am not trying to convince you or others but sharing my opinion:
h
> I am not trying to convince you
If that's really true then you're wasting my and everyone's time here.
> Signaling period is a waste of time if mining pools that agreed on a soft
fork earlier do politics
They can and will do politics regardless of why misunderstandings about
signaling. This i
> Why do you care what they think? Why does it matter if they misunderstand?
I care about improving soft fork activation mechanism and shared one of the
advantages that helps avoid misleading things. It matters because they are
participants in this process.
> If the people aren't imaginary, the
Hi Billy,
>i*X*G
I believe you understand this now, but just to be clear, it's not possible
to multiply a point by another point. At best you can take the x coordinate
of i*X and multiply that by G.
>all this assumes that a modulus operator is defined for elliptic curve
points in a way that make
> Many users, miners and exchanges still think its voting
Why do you care what they think? Why does it matter if they misunderstand?
> it is not an imaginary group of people
If the people aren't imaginary, then its their importance that's imaginary.
> One example of a mining pool
This isn't e
