Re: [bitcoin-dev] A fee-bumping model

2021-11-30 Thread darosior via bitcoin-dev
Hi Antoine, Thanks for your comment. I believe for Lightning it's simpler with regard to the management of the UTxO pool, but harder with regard to choosing a threat model. Responses inline. > For any opened channel, ensure the confirmation of a Commitment transaction > and the children HTLC-Su

Re: [bitcoin-dev] A fee-bumping model

2021-11-30 Thread Prayank via bitcoin-dev
Good morning darosior, Subject of the email looks interesting and I have few comments on the things shared: > The part of Revault we are interested in for this study is the delegation > process, and more specifically the application of spending policies by > network monitors (watchtowers). Par

Re: [bitcoin-dev] A fee-bumping model

2021-11-30 Thread Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
Hi Darosior, Nice work, few thoughts binding further your model for Lightning. > For any delegated vault, ensure the confirmation of a Cancel transaction in a configured number of > blocks at any point. In so doing, minimize the overpayments and the UTxO set footprint. Overpayments > increase the