drivechain is a cool proposal. i don't think there's a ton of
obvious risk to the network itself (not slow, not too much work for
nodes, etc), but it seems to encourage "bad behavior", not sure the
incentives line up to prevent thefts, and not sure that won't turn
around and bite bitcoin's main c
Good morning Prayank,
Just to be clear, neither Liquid nor RSK, as of my current knowledge, are
Drivechain systems.
Instead, they are both federated sidechains.
The money owned by a federated sidechain is, as far s the Bitcoin blockchain is
concerned, really owned by the federation that.runs th
printf("Hello, World!");
What are your thoughts on Drivechain and associated BIPs?
This article compares Liquid and Lightning:
https://blog.liquid.net/six-differences-between-liquid-and-lightning/. Two
things from it that I am interested in while evaluating Drivechain:
1.Trust model
2.On-Ramps
Hi Peter,
Yep, I think it is a good idea just to do new BIP and ignore IANA opinion on
the matter. I can write it since I was going to propose pretty much the same
thing some time ago. I will share the draft in this mail list in a week.
Kind regards,
Maxim Orlovsky
LNP/BP Standards Association
How would you compare this to Stratum v2?
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 1:02 AM pool2win via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> We have been working on a peer to peer mining pool that overcomes the
> problems faced by P2Pool and enables building a futures market for
> hashrat
