one interesting point that came up at the bitdevs in austin today that
favors remove that i believe is new to this discussion (it was new to me):
the argument can be reduced to:
- dust limit is a per-node relay policy.
- it is rational for miners to mine dust outputs given their cost of
maintenan
Something that could work really well here could be having a norm of using
the checksum for bright colors, weights, sizes, capitalizations, and/or
spacing of the characters of the address, making different addresses more
clearly visually distinct.
Ethereum uses mixed case to do this a little bit:
As an alternative, you might want to consider LifeHash, which includes a
visual indicator as well as a readable fingerprint value.
LifeHash is an open source visual hashing algorithm that we use for all our
projects. Lifehash has a number of desirable qualities, including high
complexity, good aes
Hello ZmnSCPxj,
ZmnSCPxj wrote on 8/16/21 5:34 AM:
Good morning TS,
Entering a BTC address for a transaction can pose a risk of error (human or
technical). While
there is a checksum integrated in BTC addresses already, this is used only at a
technical
level and does not avoid entering a vali
