Re: [bitcoin-dev] BLS library released

nice! how does it compare to Shigeo's implementation? https://github.com/herumi/bls On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 7:10 PM Bram Cohen via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > BLS signatures have the same aggregation feature as Schnorr signatures but > even better because the aggr

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BLS library released

Awesome! Haven’t had the chance to run it myself yet, so curious what benchmarks you are getting? Best, Alex > On Aug 3, 2018, at 14:22, Bram Cohen via bitcoin-dev > wrote: > > BLS signatures have the same aggregation feature as Schnorr signatures but > even better because the aggregation c

[bitcoin-dev] BIP171 - Mocked implementation, generated specs, live API and 16 clients libs

I just released CERISE (website & github ) a project with the following artifacts : - A mocked server implementation to start developing clients : https://github.com/straumat/cerise. - A live & documented API to underst

Re: [bitcoin-dev] bitcoin-transactions

IMHO you should almost never publish a service that asks users for private keys. A warning isn't enough. Your server might get compromised. "Move your coins by yourself" isn't even correct if your server is involved. On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 13:26, Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists

[bitcoin-dev] BLS library released

BLS signatures have the same aggregation feature as Schnorr signatures but even better because the aggregation can be done non-interactively, at the expense of being a bit slower. We just released a first draft (but fully functional) library for doing BLS signatures based on a construction based on