As i understand it, the transactions to be included in a block are
entirely up to the miner of that block.
What prevents a miner from implementing the proposal on their own?
If this is adopted as some kind of "policy", what forces a miner to
follow it?
Jim Renkel
On 12/2/2017 10:07 PM, Da
Good afternoon ZmnSCPxj,
I have posted some discussion on the need for this proposal and, some
refinements to the proposal explanation (not changes to the intended operation)
to the bitcoin-discuss list. I didn't exactly mean to double post but thought
it could use the discussion and, not to p
Good morning Damian,
The primary problem in your proposal, as I understand it, is that the
"transaction pool" is never committed to and is not part of consensus
currently. It is unlikely that the transaction pool will ever be part of
consensus, as putting the transaction pool into consensus is
Good morning Paul and Chris,
>3. Collective Action Problem
>
>There actually is a collective action problem inherent to fraudulent
>withdrawals.
>
>If miners wish to fraudulently withdraw from the sidechain, they need to
>choose the destination addresses (on mainchain Bitcoin Core) months in
>a
