Hi ZmnSCPxj,
However, a lockbox on one chain is a WT on the other
> chain. We can create a free lockbox on Ess, then use that lockbox as
> a WT on Tee, inflating TeeCoin.
I'm not sure if I follow what you are saying here. What do you mean by
'free lockbox'? I was assuming that I created an arbi
Hi Luca,
Bravissimo!
Please allow me to encourage your to follow the BIP workflow as specified
here
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0002.mediawiki#BIP_workflow
BIP Editor freely allocates BIP numberss, however that does not constitute
approval but allows for much easier discussio
I have rewritten and simplified BIP114, and renamed it to “Merklized Script”,
as a more accurate description after consulting the original proposers of MAST.
It could be considered as a special case of MAST, but has basically the same
functions and scaling properties of MAST.
Compared with Frie
Some comments with the tail-call execution semantics BIP:
Tail-call execution semantics require “unclean stake”, i.e. final stake with
more than one item. However, “unclean stake” is invalid (not just non-standard)
in BIP141, so you could only use it with legacy P2SH (which is totally
pointless
