BIP: ?
Title: Standard address format for timelocked funds
Author: ZmnSCPxj
Comments-Summary: ?
Comments-URI: ?
Status: ?
Type: ?
Created: 2017-07-01
License: CC0-1.0
== Abstract ==
OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY provides a method of
locking funds until a particular time arrives.
One potential use of th
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> Larger block sizes is not likely to have a meaningful impact on fee pressure.
> Any expectations that do not match the reality are merely misguided, and
> should not be a basis for changing Bitcoin.
I think it's very clear that
> Maximum transaction size is kept, to maximize compatibility with current
> software and prevent algorithmic and data size DoS's.
IIRC, it is actually increased by ~81 bytes, and doesn't count witness data if
on Segwit transactions (so in effect, nearly 4 MB transactions are possible).
This pro
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> This is not a hard fork, simply adding a new limit is a soft fork. You
> appear to be confused - as originally written, AFAIR, Jeff's btc1 branch
> did not increase the block size, your specification here matches that
> origina
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a BIP that matches the reference code that the Segwit2x group has
> built and published a week ago.
I'm happy to see that someone has begun writing a specification. But I
am appalled to see one just
This is horribly under-specified (ie not possible to implement from what
you've written, and your implementation doesn't match at all, last I heard).
> Specification
> The plain block size is defined as the serialized block size without
> witness programs.
> Deploy a modified BIP91 to activate Se
Hello,
Here is a BIP that matches the reference code that the Segwit2x group has
built and published a week ago.
This BIP and code satisfies the requests of a large part of the Bitcoin
community for a moderate increase in the Bitcoin non-witness block space
coupled with the activation of Segwit.
What if you want height based but lockinontimeout = false ?
On 7 Jul 2017 8:09 am, "shaolinfry via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I have written a height based reference implementation as well as updated
> the BIP text in the following proposals
>
> "lockinontimeou