??? what do you mean? (https://www.soyoustart.com/fr/serveurs-essential/)
Le 20/04/2017 à 17:50, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev a écrit :
> Try to find 1TB dedicated server hosting ...
>
> If you want to set up an ecommerce site somewhere besides your living
> room, storage costs are still a conce
Dear all,
An initial reference implementation of bip-genvbvoting (spec: [1]) is now
available at
https://github.com/sanch0panza/bitcoin/commits/genvbvoting-bu-dev-clean1
starting at commit fdd83383436ee43b072c258d4a6feb713902c77e .
This development is based against the Bitcoin Unlimited 'dev'
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:46:33AM +0200, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:30:30 CEST David Vorick via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > > I suggested something similar which is a much simpler version;
> > > https://zander.github.io/scaling/Pruning/
>
> > Your proposal ha
Since BIP 141's version bit assignment will timeout soon, and needing renewal,
I was thinking it might make sense to make some minor tweaks to the spec for
the next deployment. These aren't critical, so it's perfectly fine if BIP 141
activates as-is (potentially with BIP 148), but IMO would be a
Dear Greg,
Thank you for taking the time to review the BIP148 proposal.
I agree with much of your thoughts. I originally started working on a
generalized way to deploy user activated soft forks, in a way that leveraged
BIP9 to allow for optional faster MASF activation. BIP148 came about as a wa
I have taken some time to think about consensus systems in-general; and write
up a guide that explores the problems space of changing the rules of such
systems.
Hopefully, this guide will clarify the different options available to the
Bitcoin Community.
I am posting this to the Bitcoin Develop
I agree, addresses create vulnerability, an OP_RETURN signal seems the
safest way to go for UA signalling. I can model a BIP after BIP9, with
some discussion of how to properly collect statistics, and the ability for
nodes to activate features based on an "economic majority" defined in this
way.
Try to find 1TB dedicated server hosting ...
If you want to set up an ecommerce site somewhere besides your living room,
storage costs are still a concern.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Danny Thorpe via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 1TB HDD is now available for
Bitcoin must level the playing field for mining or it is fundamentally
broken. And there are two obvious solutions:
1. WTXID commitment has as a flag day upgrade. It's a fix to a fairly
serious security issue - made even worse by the existence of patents on the
code.
2. Embed the code for perfo
A WTXID commitment would (likely) need to be a UASF.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> The "UASF movement" seems a bit premature to me - I doubt UASF will be
> necessary if a WTXID commitment is tried first. I thin
On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 19:30:30 CEST David Vorick via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> > I suggested something similar which is a much simpler version;
> > https://zander.github.io/scaling/Pruning/
> Your proposal has a significant disadvantage: If every peer is dropping
> 75% of all blocks randomly, th
Thanks but you did not answer all the points and some of your statements
look wrong, like the global ideas behind this proposal from my
standpoint, which basically is inventing strange things not reusing what
is already proven to be working well and could provide the same result,
which at the end i
12 matches
Mail list logo
