Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capital Efficient Honeypots w/ "Scorched Earth" Doublespending Protection

2016-08-27 Thread Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
On 25 August 2016 14:26:21 GMT-04:00, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev wrote: >On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Christian Decker via bitcoin-dev > wrote: >> If however >> he is planning to use it as a foothold to further compromise your >> company, send spam or similar, he will likely try to avo

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capital Efficient Honeypots w/ "Scorched Earth" Doublespending Protection

2016-08-27 Thread James MacWhyte via bitcoin-dev
Why not just have a single 1-of-m multisig transaction, with one key on each server? Based on which key is used you would know which server is compromised, and (in my opinion) it wouldn't look nearly as suspicious. On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:26 AM Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@list