[bitcoin-dev] [BIP] OP_CHECKPRIVPUBPAIR

2015-11-27 Thread Mats Jerratsch via bitcoin-dev
Prior discussion: http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2015-November/000309.html Goal: Greatly improve security for payment networks like the 'Lightning Network' (LN) [1] --- Introduction: To improve privacy while using a payment network, it is possible to use onion-routing t

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Alternative name for CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY (BIP112)

2015-11-27 Thread Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev
On Nov 26, 2015 12:06 AM, "Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev" < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Again my objection would go away if we renamed nSequence, but I actually think the nSequence name is better... I suggested to rename nSequence to nMaturity on this list even before the bi

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Alternative name for CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY (BIP112)

2015-11-27 Thread Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev
After reading Rusty's post, I admit there's something to be said for the fact that both the script and the nSequence field play a combined role, and thus, making the interaction between the two more clear in the naming make sense. It is somewhat unfortunate that currently, we can't just have a d