Summary
---
Opt-In Full-RBF allows senders to opt-into full-RBF semantics for their
transactions in a way that allows receivers to detect if the sender has
done so. Existing "first-seen" mempool semantics are left unchanged for
transactions that do not opt-in.
At last week's IRC meeting(1) we
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 03:27:49PM -0800, Peter Tschipper via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I'd like to use service bit 28 for testing the block compression
> prototype unless anyone has any objections or is using it already.
Go for it!
AFAIK the only testing service bit in use right now is bit 26, used t
OK, adding the relevant code fragment is probably the simplest and direct
option. Done.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Jorge Timón wrote:
> Not a native english speaker myself, so I may have missed some things...
>
> Yes, sorry about the link. I guess you can point to #6230 . I can
> rebase it
Not a native english speaker myself, so I may have missed some things...
Yes, sorry about the link. I guess you can point to #6230 . I can
rebase it if needed but I would close it again because I don't want to
have too many things from #6382 opened at the same time (is noisy and
worse for review).
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> We have strayed far from both the Subject line and from making progress
> on bitcoin development. Please redirect to bitcoin-discuss.
>
> I have set the moderation bits on the three contributors from here down
> (CC'd): your next post will g
