On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 01:56:34PM -0500, Bryan Bishop via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Here is a short review of previously-proposed and exotic SIGHASH types.
>
> SIGHASH_MULTIPLE
> Similarly, petertodd has asked for a SIGHASH_DONT_SIGN_TXID before to
> make OP_CODESEPARATOR more useful.
There's also my
>>>I would be OK with $100 transaction fee
Unless you're relying upon some hypothetical hyper-inflation of the USD,
how does one accept or justify such fees given the title (and intentions)
of Satoshi's own white paper and corresponding software?
I believe the key words "cash system" must be kept
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Peter R via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> - Bitcoin-B (Blockstream)
Blockstream currently has no interest in maintaining a separate
implementation of Bitcoin.
At this time I believe doing so would have significantly negative
value; especially in light of the current climat
I agree, s7r, that Bitcoin Core represents the most stable code base. To
create multiple implementations, other groups would fork Bitcoin Core similar
to what Bitcoin XT did. We could have:
- Bitcoin-A (XT)
- Bitcoin-B (Blockstream)
- Bitcoin-C (promoting BIP100)
- Bitcoin-D
- etc.
Innovation
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 20:26:17 -0400
From: hurricanewa...@aol.com
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes by
closing port 8333 via a hidden firewall in the cable box
Message-ID: <14f864c1631-3abb-a...@webprd-a67
You should tell AT&T that you want the DVR/cable box put into what is
usually referred to as "bridge mode" or sometimes "true bridge mode"
depending on your ISP and then use your own router, look under
"Bridged Mode" at the bottom of this page for AT&T
http://www.att.com/gen/general?pid=23697 . You
I have been struggling to get port 8333 open all year,
After hours of phone calls and messaging AT&T finally told me the truth
of what was going on,
I went through this Comcast involving another port. When they blocked
the port I asked them the reason (I referenced their privacy policy that
I have been struggling to get port 8333 open all year, I gave up and was using
blockchain for months despite a strong desire to stay on Bitcoin Core, but now
the issue has reached critical mass since I'm using the python Bitcoin server
module. I have literally spent my entire day trying to open
> Bitcoin is a decentralized currency which allows any person the
ability to transact in a way that does not require specific trust in
any particular party.
Bitcoin is only a partial solution to the Byzantine general problem.
Users do need to trust that things such as mining and development
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Decentralization depends on the context and does not have a definition
in a form that it was demanded... I can confirm we have people in our
community which do understand decentralization, and quite good
actually, just there is no definition if the f
Indeed, for an occasional reader perspective, nightmarish. List signature
also a bit annoying but it's possible to live with it.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Warren Togami Jr. via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I think we should agree to disable the
On 2015-08-31, at 2:24 PM, Allen Piscitello via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> Even so, decentralization is a means to an end - not an end-goal. It is
> essential for Bitcoin to be a useful alternative, of course.
I agree. What about decentralization in development? Gavin recently said that
he wants
On 08/31/2015 05:53 PM, Monarch wrote:
>
> Bitcoin is a decentralized currency which allows any person the
> ability to transact in a way that does not require specific trust in
> any particular party. Users can independently verify that
> transactions they receive are valid and confirmed, with s
On 2015-08-31 21:54, Justus Ranvier wrote:
You keep using the word "decentralized" without explaining (and most
likely, understanding) what it means.
Decentralization is a ubiquitous term within the Bitcoin, and the
definition is by no measure new or often confused. It is realizing
that syst
Hi folks,
I think we should agree to disable the ability to subscribe with digests on
bitcoin-dev list. I think digests were from an earlier era of Internet
history. Digests are inconvenient for everyone because replies have the
problem of breaking threads.These days people should be setting
On 08/31/2015 04:42 PM, Monarch wrote:
> The justification for the existence of Bitcoins hinges on it. What is
> described in the whitepaper is a system without the trust of third
> parties to process electronic payments, this can not exist without
> decentralization. Absent any unforseen revelat
On 2015-08-31 21:24, Allen Piscitello wrote:
Even so, decentralization is a means to an end - not an end-goal. It
is essential for Bitcoin to be a useful alternative, of course.
The justification for the existence of Bitcoins hinges on it. What is
described in the whitepaper is a system with
Even so, decentralization is a means to an end - not an end-goal. It is
essential for Bitcoin to be a useful alternative, of course.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Monarch via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On 2015-08-31 20:27, Justus Ranvier wrote:
>
>> You don'
On 2015-08-31 20:27, Justus Ranvier wrote:
You don't understand what value proof of work provides, or what
features
differentiate good money from poor money, and you can't make a
defensible statement of Bitcoin's value proposition.
Because you can't do these things, you assume nobody else can d
ly that:
1. Bitcoin is decentralised
2. Nobody should modify the code in certain ways without the agreement of me
and my buddies
is just doublethink.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments
On 08/31/2015 03:06 PM, Monarch via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> What is Bitcoin if not decentralized?
>
> Bitcoin the most awkward, unprivate and damaging currencies ever
> created. It is terribly slow for general use, and it is very
> difficult for users to get over the technical hurdles required to us
On 2015-08-31 19:11, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev wrote:
I think your summary of what people actually want from
decentralisation is pretty good, Justus.
I don't believe that any Bitcoin user actually cares
about decentralization, because none of them I've asked can define
that term.
+1 Insight
I think your summary of what people actually want from decentralisation is
pretty good, Justus.
> I don't believe that any Bitcoin user actually cares
> about decentralization, because none of them I've asked can define that
> term.
>
+1 Insightful
It's been quite impressive to see so many Bitc
On 08/30/2015 01:38 AM, Adam Ritter via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Still, it doesn't have anything that is practical for me as an user of
> the Bitcoin network (I use it for storing long-term purchase value, as
> most of the people who I know): it doesn't help me if I still need to
> pay transaction fees
Jorge Timón 於 2015-08-30 14:56 寫到:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 7:13 PM, wrote:
This is based on the assumption that miners would always like to use
up the
last byte of the available block size. However, this is just not true:
1. The 6 year blockchain history has shown that most miners have a
so
Yup I've been looking over twister thoroughly this week, it's very close to
what I'm thinking and I'm sure the developer of that could easily do the
project I'm doing. However he decided to make an alt coin and didn't use the
real blockchain, which makes his network weak. It's a waste to not tak
Bryan Bishop via bitcoin-dev 於 2015-08-30 14:56 寫到:
SIGHASH_WITHOUT_PREV_SCRIPTPUBKEY
SIGHASH_WITHOUT_PREV_VALUE
SIGHASH_WITHOUT_INPUT_TXID
SIGHASH_WITHOUT_INPUT_INDEX
SIGHASH_WITHOUT_INPUT_SEQUENCE
SIGHASH_WITHOUT_OUTPUT_SCRIPTPUBKEY
SIGHASH_WITHOUT_OUTPUT_VALUE
SIGHASH_WITHOUT_INPUTS
SIGHASH_
The de-centralized forum directly integrates the Bitcoin blockchain with every
post. I can see how you misunderstood since I wasn't specific in my first
email. I'm surprised no one has done this yet, people have done things very
similar but never took the leap to integrate the actual Bitcoin blo
One last comment here on this topic;
For anybody who wants to discuss decentralized communication mechanisms in
general, they can come to www.reddit.com/r/p2pcomms (up until these
decentralized forums have become stable and common).
I've seen quite a few more of these projects lately, I want to m
Thanks for nice decentralized discussion.
This wasn't and isn't a parody.
Mining is insecure (for society) and security is passive.
All the raised points are proven by esteemed members themselves.
Closing from my side.
Thanks,
God Bless,
Bye
Prabhat Kumar Singh
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 6:17 PM,
>This is a technical list dedicated to technical discussions revolving around
>the bitcoin protocol and related technologies.
I am so sorry. I thought this was XT list :)
Apologies to everyone.
___
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoun
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:03:33PM -0500, sisadm101--- via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> is from a one sided point of view? There doesn't seem to be a solution at
> this time, but I find it dissapointing that many (in this very email list)
Please, this has drifted so far from the goal of this list: bitcoi
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:49 AM, NxtChg wrote:
>>While this topic is very interesting, I do not see how it is
>>relevant to a mailing list dedicated to technical and academic debate.
>>Please can you take this discussion elsewhere.
>
> Wow. I have Deja Vu. Where have I heard recently that discuss
>...so people posting to it will always have a venue to speak without being
>censored.
So is the attacker, who aims to make the place unusable.
___
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailma
>While this topic is very interesting, I do not see how it is
>relevant to a mailing list dedicated to technical and academic debate.
>Please can you take this discussion elsewhere.
Wow. I have Deja Vu. Where have I heard recently that discussing Bitcoin split
is off topic and must be stopped?
While this topic is very interesting, I do not see how it is relevant
to a mailing list dedicated to technical and academic debate. Please
can you take this discussion elsewhere.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Zach G via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> When I say de-centralized I mean it, all the things
When I say de-centralized I mean it, all the things you listed are
centralized. Reddit is actually a purely centralized system and just as
unhealthy as the current bitcoin forum. We have the technology, I'm simply
putting together the pieces that other people have already built. This forum
wi
>I am creating a de-centralized forum, and I mean truly decentralized as I nor
>anyone else will be able to control it.
Zander is working on the same thing: https://www.reddit.com/r/AetheralResearch/
But it's actually quite difficult to make it truly censorship-resistant: both
in solving the t
38 matches
Mail list logo
