Hello Ondrej,
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 7:51 AM Ondrej Zajicek
wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 07:12:53AM -0700, Terra Nova wrote:
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 12:21 AM Alexander Zubkov
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I suppose it could happen because "for" is looking for
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 07:12:53AM -0700, Terra Nova wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 12:21 AM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I suppose it could happen because "for" is looking for an active route
> > for the given destination. And filtered routes would not be matche
Hi Alexander,
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 12:21 AM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I suppose it could happen because "for" is looking for an active route
> for the given destination. And filtered routes would not be matched.
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 3:57 AM Terra Nova wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
Hi,
I suppose it could happen because "for" is looking for an active route
for the given destination. And filtered routes would not be matched.
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 3:57 AM Terra Nova wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> Ubuntu-16.04.6 LTS
> bird-1.6.6 (built from source)
>
> Our upstream BGP configurat
Greetings,
Ubuntu-16.04.6 LTS
bird-1.6.6 (built from source)
Our upstream BGP configuration is using: import keep filtered on
I was checking the master table for a (filtered) destination IPv6 address
(and network) doing the following.
bird> show route for 2620:0:6b0:ff00::20
Network not in tab
