Re: iBGP - Simple static route exchange

2017-03-05 Thread Борис Коваленко
No, off the list is not special, returning to it. Yes, overlapping is in bird as it import routes from kernel. Just remove routes from kernel and you'll get working config. ⁣С уважением, Борис Коваленко​ На 5 марта 2017 г., 22:39, в 22:39, Cedric Lemarchand написал:>Hum I am starting to under

Re: iBGP - Simple static route exchange

2017-03-05 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 01:51:10PM +0100, Cedric Lemarchand wrote: > On host1 (10.10.1.1) : > > bird> show route all for 192.168.1.0/24 > 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth1 [direct1 13:44:52] * (240) > Type: device unicast univ >via 10.10.1.1 on eth0 [static1 13:44:52] (200) >

Re: iBGP - Simple static route exchange

2017-03-05 Thread Cedric Lemarchand
On host1 (10.10.1.1) : bird> show route all for 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth1 [direct1 13:44:52] * (240) Type: device unicast univ via 10.10.1.1 on eth0 [static1 13:44:52] (200) Type: static unicast univ bird> show route all for 192.168.2.0/24 Netwo

iBGP - Simple static route exchange

2017-03-05 Thread Борис Коваленко
Hello! Would You please show the output for 'show route all for 192.168.1.0/24' and also 'show route all where proto = "static1"' *Regards,* *Boris* -- С уважением, Борис Коваленко

Re: iBGP - Simple static route exchange

2017-03-05 Thread Cedric Lemarchand
Hello, Any hints will be greatly appreciated ! Cheers — Cédric Lemarchand > On 25 Feb 2017, at 18:03, Cedric Lemarchand wrote: > > Hello Ondrej, > > Thanks for your precious explanations. Unfortunately I am still stuck, static > routes does not apply between 2 hosts. > > To solve 1) and 2)

Re: iBGP - Simple static route exchange

2017-02-28 Thread Cedric Lemarchand
Bump -- Cédric Lemarchand > Le 25 févr. 2017 à 18:03, Cedric Lemarchand a écrit : > > Hello Ondrej, > > Thanks for your precious explanations. Unfortunately I am still stuck, static > routes does not apply between 2 hosts. > > To solve 1) and 2), and in the way I only need to publish static

Re: iBGP - Simple static route exchange

2017-02-25 Thread Cedric Lemarchand
Hello Ondrej, Thanks for your precious explanations. Unfortunately I am still stuck, static routes does not apply between 2 hosts. To solve 1) and 2), and in the way I only need to publish static routes to other BGP hosts, I changed "export all” by "export where proto = “static1” “, but still

Re: iBGP - Simple static route exchange

2017-02-23 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 04:42:50PM +0100, Cedric Lemarchand wrote: > Yes, I am not sure to understand how plays theses options (and if I need it) > in the bgp protocol and it they are related to my problem : > > gateway recursive : means that if host2 advertise "route 192.168.2.0/24 > via 10.10

Re: iBGP - Simple static route exchange

2017-02-23 Thread Cedric Lemarchand
 > On 23 Feb 2017, at 16:09, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 02:45:34PM +0100, Cedric Lemarchand wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to distribute 2 static routes between 2 hosts, not directly >> connected, and I am having hard time to make it works … >> >> host

Re: iBGP - Simple static route exchange

2017-02-23 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 02:45:34PM +0100, Cedric Lemarchand wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to distribute 2 static routes between 2 hosts, not directly > connected, and I am having hard time to make it works … > > host1 10.10.1.1 (eth0) own subnet 192.168.1.0/24 ( 192.168.1.1 on eth1) > host2 1

Re: iBGP - Simple static route exchange

2017-02-23 Thread Cedric Lemarchand
FYI, Bird version is 1.4.5. — Cédric Lemarchand > On 23 Feb 2017, at 14:45, Cedric Lemarchand wrote: > > Hello, > > I am trying to distribute 2 static routes between 2 hosts, not directly > connected, and I am having hard time to make it works … > > host1 10.10.1.1 (eth0) own subnet 192.168

iBGP - Simple static route exchange

2017-02-23 Thread Cedric Lemarchand
Hello, I am trying to distribute 2 static routes between 2 hosts, not directly connected, and I am having hard time to make it works … host1 10.10.1.1 (eth0) own subnet 192.168.1.0/24 ( 192.168.1.1 on eth1) host2 10.10.2.1 (eth0) own subnet 192.168.2.0/24 ( 192.168.2.1 on eth1) I get the follo