Re: comparing open source BGP stacks performance

2022-03-04 Thread Daniel Suchy
Hello, On 3/4/22 18:38, Douglas Fischer wrote: I'm not a great connoisseur of Juniper's portfolio, and I still don't really know what this “junos rs-16” is. on https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/day-one-books/DO_BGPSharding.pdf is document describing how is multithreading handled in

Re: comparing open source BGP stacks performance

2022-03-04 Thread Douglas Fischer
Bringing back to the table this EXCELLENT job made by Justin. https://elegantnetwork.github.io/posts/BGP-commercial-stacks/ In this chapter he also tested Junos cRPD and Rusty BGP. And two things really caught my attention: - Firstly, RustyBGP's exceptional performance. - But what caught my a

Re: comparing open source BGP stacks performance

2021-09-01 Thread Justin Pietsch
(added bird-users@ back, I didn't mean to remove them before) Sorry that I missed that you'd already added the pull request. I merged it. we do need a way to specify exabgp vs bird, but that's just another thing to add. I agree about containers and versions. Just haven't had time to think it thro

Re: comparing open source BGP stacks performance

2021-08-26 Thread Douglas Fischer
Could it be compared with Bird Runing one RIB per participant? Em qua., 25 de ago. de 2021 às 11:16, Laura Smith < n5d9xq3ti233xiyif...@protonmail.ch> escreveu: > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Tuesday, August 24th, 2021 at 8:03 PM, Chris Malayter < > must...@terahertz.net> wrote: > > >

Re: comparing open source BGP stacks performance

2021-08-25 Thread Laura Smith
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, August 24th, 2021 at 8:03 PM, Chris Malayter wrote: > OpenBGPd has always been a dog. For those of you who don't monitor the OpenBSD mailing list, explanation from Claudio Jeker (one of the key figures in OpenBGPD dev): The massive amount of memor

Re: comparing open source BGP stacks performance

2021-08-24 Thread Laura Smith
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, July 27th, 2021 at 7:39 PM, Justin Pietsch wrote: > Hi all, because I couldn't find many results of performance tests of open > source routing stacks, I did some tests and wrote up  > https://elegantnetwork.github.io/posts/comparing-open-source-bg

Re: comparing open source BGP stacks performance

2021-08-24 Thread Chris Malayter
OpenBGPd has always been a dog. Of all that you tested, I’d still stick with bird. Awesome testing though. Chris > On Aug 24, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Fran wrote: > > Hej, > >> Such a shame you missed out OpenBGPD by the OpenBSD team. ;-( > > Justin did a followup including rustybgp and openb

Re: comparing open source BGP stacks performance

2021-08-24 Thread Fran
Hej, Such a shame you missed out OpenBGPD by the OpenBSD team. ;-( Justin did a followup including rustybgp and openbgpd: https://elegantnetwork.github.io/posts/followup-measuring-BGP-stacks/ Best, f.

Re: comparing open source BGP stacks performance

2021-08-24 Thread Maria Matejka
Hello! I've updated bgperf somehow, see my fork: https://github.com/marenamat/bgperf Notable changes are: * replacing ExaBGP by BIRD to consume less resources by feeding * fixed policy configuration in BIRD (no clue whether it works with other stacks) Thanks a lot for the batch feat

Re: comparing open source BGP stacks performance

2021-07-28 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:39:52AM -0700, Justin Pietsch wrote: > Hi all, because I couldn't find many results of performance tests of open > source routing stacks, I did some tests and wrote up > https://elegantnetwork.github.io/posts/comparing-open-source-bgp-stacks/. > It compares BIRD, FRRoutin

comparing open source BGP stacks performance

2021-07-27 Thread Justin Pietsch
Hi all, because I couldn't find many results of performance tests of open source routing stacks, I did some tests and wrote up https://elegantnetwork.github.io/posts/comparing-open-source-bgp-stacks/. It compares BIRD, FRRouting and GoBGP. Justin