On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 03:20:59PM +0100, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> Thanks for the bugreport and patch. We already found and fixed the bug
> during work on 2.0 branch [*], but we forgot to fix it in 1.6 branch.
> Your patch should be OK.
Merged
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Za
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 02:20:28PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 07:41:44PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > bgp_init() in proto/bgp/bgp.c does:
> >
> > P->accept_ra_types = c->secondary ? RA_ACCEPTED : RA_OPTIMAL;
> >
> > and then bgp_rx_open() in
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 07:41:44PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> bgp_init() in proto/bgp/bgp.c does:
>
> P->accept_ra_types = c->secondary ? RA_ACCEPTED : RA_OPTIMAL;
>
> and then bgp_rx_open() in proto/bgp/packets.c does:
>
> if (p->add_path_tx)
> p->p.accept_ra_types = RA
Hi!
bgp_init() in proto/bgp/bgp.c does:
P->accept_ra_types = c->secondary ? RA_ACCEPTED : RA_OPTIMAL;
and then bgp_rx_open() in proto/bgp/packets.c does:
if (p->add_path_tx)
p->p.accept_ra_types = RA_ANY;
As bgp_init() seems to only be called at configuration time, this
means that if y
