Re: Transiting

2017-03-26 Thread Michael McConnell
9:08:25 2017, Michael McConnell wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> We are running into an issue transiting a down stream ASN. E.g. Uplink >> <-> Our ASN <-> Downlink ASN >> >> To me it seems we should only need to bgp_path.prepend our outbound >> fi

Re: Transiting

2017-03-26 Thread Michael McConnell
enderson wrote: > > On 2017/03/26 09:08, Michael McConnell wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> We are running into an issue transiting a down stream ASN. E.g. Uplink >> <-> Our ASN <-> Downlink ASN >> >> To me it seems we should only need to bgp_path.

Re: Transiting

2017-03-26 Thread joel jaeggli
On 3/26/17 10:08 AM, Michael McConnell wrote: > Hello all, > > We are running into an issue transiting a down stream ASN. E.g. Uplink > <-> Our ASN <-> Downlink ASN > > To me it seems we should only need to bgp_path.prepend our outbound > filter, however our up

Re: Transiting

2017-03-26 Thread Alarig Le Lay
On dim. 26 mars 09:08:25 2017, Michael McConnell wrote: > Hello all, > > We are running into an issue transiting a down stream ASN. E.g. Uplink > <-> Our ASN <-> Downlink ASN > > To me it seems we should only need to bgp_path.prepend our outbound > filter, howe

Re: Transiting

2017-03-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/03/26 09:08, Michael McConnell wrote: > Hello all, > > We are running into an issue transiting a down stream ASN. E.g. Uplink > <-> Our ASN <-> Downlink ASN > > To me it seems we should only need to bgp_path.prepend our outbound > filter, however our up

Transiting

2017-03-26 Thread Michael McConnell
Hello all, We are running into an issue transiting a down stream ASN. E.g. Uplink <-> Our ASN <-> Downlink ASN To me it seems we should only need to bgp_path.prepend our outbound filter, however our uplink is dropping the as path when we run it that way. Any suggestions as