rs->src->proto->proto;
}
Thanks
Arvin
-Original Message-
From: Ondrej Zajicek
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 10:58 PM
To: Arvin Gan
Cc: bird-users@network.cz; Robert Blayzor
Subject: Re: BGP route selection
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 03:35:43AM +, Arvin Gan wrote:
roto > old->attrs->src->proto->proto;
}
Thanks
Arvin
-Original Message-
From: Ondrej Zajicek
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 10:58 PM
To: Arvin Gan
Cc: bird-users@network.cz; Robert Blayzor
Subject: Re: BGP route selection
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 03:35:43AM +, Arvin
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 03:35:43AM +, Arvin Gan wrote:
> Hi all,
>Sorry, it's my ambiguous description. What I said default value is Cisco's
> admin distance value, eBGP is 20 and iBGP is 200. We plan to use preference
> to implement admin distance. Actually ,in bird, the preference of
rvin
-Original Message-
From: Bird-users On Behalf Of Robert Blayzor
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 10:07 PM
To: bird-users@network.cz
Subject: Re: BGP route selection
On 4/17/18 8:20 AM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> Hi
>
> No, default value is 200 for both EBGP and IBGP. Where did y
On 4/17/18 8:20 AM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
Hi
No, default value is 200 for both EBGP and IBGP. Where did you noticed 20?
20 is Cisco's default admin distance for EBGP.
--
inoc.net!rblayzor
XMPP: rblayzor.AT.inoc.net
PGP: https://inoc.net/~rblayzor/
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:50:24AM +, Arvin Gan wrote:
> Hi,
> I notice that there is a description of route selection algorithm:
>
> The global best route selection algorithm is (roughly) as follows:
>
> * Preferences of the routes are compared.
> * Source protocol instance prefere
