Hi,
Anno domini 2023 Ondrej Zajicek scripsit:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 01:43:02PM +0100, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
> > Anno domini 2023 Ondrej Zajicek scripsit:
> > [...]
> > > I hope it does not break some multipoint tunnels like Wireguard, they
> > > often have bad flags reported by kernel, but
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 01:43:02PM +0100, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anno domini 2023 Ondrej Zajicek scripsit:
>
> [...]
> > I hope it does not break some multipoint tunnels like Wireguard, they
> > often have bad flags reported by kernel, but they should be configured as
> > PtMP anyway
Hi,
Anno domini 2023 Ondrej Zajicek scripsit:
[...]
> I hope it does not break some multipoint tunnels like Wireguard, they
> often have bad flags reported by kernel, but they should be configured as
> PtMP anyways.
I disagree on the PtMP part.
I've deliberately set up a bunch of Wireguard tunn
m: Ondrej Zajicek
> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2023 9:41 PM
> To: Soha Jin
> Cc: bird-users@network.cz; Wende Tan
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] OSPF: on PtP ospf_iface with physical PtP links, skip
> next-hop resolving
>
> Hi
>
> Thanks, merged.
>
> I hope it does not
Hi
Thanks, merged.
I hope it does not break some multipoint tunnels like Wireguard, they
often have bad flags reported by kernel, but they should be configured as
PtMP anyways.
I wonder what use case is fixed by this patch, as the iface still needs
an IP address just to be considered in ospf_ifa
